> ## Documentation Index > Fetch the complete documentation index at: https://docs.getrivet.ca/llms.txt > Use this file to discover all available pages before exploring further. # Stuck point log > CPT stuck-point identification and Socratic challenge — the cognitive piece of Cognitive Processing Therapy for PTSD. A stuck point is an assimilated or over-accommodated belief that maintains PTSD. *It was my fault. The world is dangerous. I can never trust anyone again.* Cognitive Processing Therapy works by identifying these beliefs and challenging them with a structured set of Socratic questions until a more balanced alternative belief emerges. Resick and Schnicke published the CPT model in 1992; the comprehensive manual came out in 2017. The stuck-point worksheet is the core cognitive piece of the protocol. ## What the worksheet captures Three sections, in order. ### Identify the stuck point Three fields: * The stuck point — a stuck belief about the trauma, yourself, others, or the world (textarea) * How much you believe it, 0-10 (not at all → completely) * Primary emotion the stuck point produces Naming the emotion alongside the belief matters because the cognitive work is partly aimed at the emotional load the belief carries. A stuck point that produces shame is worked differently than one that produces fear. ### Challenge the stuck point Five Socratic prompts, each a large textarea: * What evidence supports this belief? * What evidence challenges this belief? * Is this belief based on facts or on feelings? What were you not in control of? * Is this a habit of thinking (something you tell yourself a lot) or actually a fact about this situation? * Are you thinking in all-or-nothing terms or extremes? What is the middle ground? The five prompts cover the cognitive territory CPT works with: evidence examination, fact-vs-feeling discrimination, the role of hindsight, the habitual nature of stuck thinking, and the all-or-nothing patterns common in trauma cognition. Going through all five with the client is the work of the session. ### Alternate belief Three fields: * A more balanced, accurate, and helpful way to think about it (textarea) * How much you believe the alternate, 0-10 * How much you believe the original stuck point now, 0-10 The re-rating of the *original* belief is the outcome measurement. CPT's mechanism is the gradual reduction of belief in the stuck point through repeated challenge — the number that drops over the course of treatment is the signal. ## When to use it * **CPT for PTSD**, across the 12-session protocol. Different stuck points surface at different sessions; each one gets worked through with the Socratic challenge structure. * **CPT-Cognitive (CPT-C) variants** that skip the trauma narrative — the worksheet is the central tool there. * **CPT for moral injury** in military or first-responder contexts, where stuck points around responsibility, justice, and self-judgment dominate. ## In-session mechanics Open **Stuck point log** from the top-right corner (**Clinical templates ▾**). You typically identify the stuck point in the first part of the session, work the five Socratic prompts together for the bulk of the session, and land the alternate belief plus re-ratings at the end. The whole worksheet copies to clipboard. Pasted into the session note, the five Socratic answers and the before/after belief ratings become part of the CPT progress record. ## A note on fidelity CPT is a manualized protocol. The cognitive work depends on the practitioner being CPT-trained — the Socratic prompts in the worksheet are *prompts*, not a substitute for the clinical skill of challenging stuck points in the right way for the client in front of you. The worksheet exists to capture the work, not to do the work. Practitioners using the worksheet outside formal CPT should know that the cognitive challenging style CPT uses (gentler, more collaborative, less debate-style) differs from how *evidence-for / evidence-against* prompts might be read by a non-CPT practitioner. ## Citation Resick, P. A., Monson, C. M., & Chard, K. M. (2017). *Cognitive Processing Therapy for PTSD: A Comprehensive Manual.* Guilford Press. Resick, P. A., & Schnicke, M. K. (1992). "Cognitive processing therapy for sexual assault victims." *Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology,* 60(5): 748-756. Stuck-point identification as a clinical concept is published peer-reviewed method, uncopyrightable. Rivet's five Socratic prompts are original — they cover the same clinical functions as the canonical CPT challenge questions in our own wording. ## When not to use it * **Trauma processing without CPT training.** The worksheet looks like a generic cognitive challenge tool, but the Socratic style and the timing of when to deploy it within trauma treatment depend on CPT-specific training. Practitioners using EMDR, PE, or generic trauma-focused CBT should use the [thought record](/clinical-templates/cbt/thought-record) or the [behavioral experiment](/clinical-templates/cbt/behavioral-experiment) inside their own modality framework. * **Acute trauma not yet stabilized.** Cognitive challenging of trauma- related beliefs requires the client to be regulated enough to engage the prompts. Stabilization comes first. * **Stuck points that aren't trauma-related.** Generic depression or anxiety cognitions belong in the thought record, not here. ## Related articles The non-trauma cognitive restructuring worksheet. PTSD symptom monitoring during CPT. The EMDR analog — different modality, related clinical problem.