The three templates
SOAP note
Four sections — Subjective, Objective, Assessment, Plan. The clinical documentation format that originated in problem-oriented medical records and crossed over into mental-health practice. Common in psychiatry, hospital-based therapy, and any practice that grew up in a medically-flavoured chart.DAP note
Three sections — Data, Assessment, Plan. Collapses Subjective + Objective into one combined Data section. Common in psychology, counselling, and social-work practice where the Subjective/Objective split feels artificial. See SOAP vs DAP for the detailed comparison.Treatment plan
Six sections — Presenting concern, Treatment goals, Objectives, Planned interventions, Progress measures, Review schedule. Authored once at the start of treatment, then revisited at review points. Same practitioner-private posture as the session notes — you export it to your EHR when you’re done.What “practitioner-private” actually means
The note template runs separately from client-fillable templates. When you open it:- Nothing is sent to your client’s device. Your client’s browser literally doesn’t know you’ve opened a note. There’s no overlay, no notification, no flicker on their side.
- No keystrokes are synced anywhere. Client-fillable templates send a snapshot of every keystroke so your live preview updates as the client types. Practitioner-private notes skip that path entirely — you’re typing into your own browser, so there’s nothing to sync.
- No durable cache. Client-fillable templates persist briefly so a reconnect after a network blip restores the in-progress responses. Practitioner-private notes never touch that cache. The content lives in your browser’s memory and nowhere else.
- Audit trail is metadata only. Rivet records that you opened a SOAP template at a given timestamp, in a given session, and whether you copied or downloaded it. The note content is not in that record.
Why this matters
Privacy. A 50-minute therapy session is among the most sensitive PHI surfaces in healthcare. Most AI-scribe products handle this by promising encryption-in-transit, encryption-at-rest, vendor BAA, and 24-hour retention. Rivet handles it by not having a session-content store at all. You can’t breach what doesn’t exist. Clarity. When you paste a note into Jane, Owl, or your paper chart, you know exactly what’s in it — because you authored it. There’s no “AI generated this part, then I edited it” provenance question. The chart entry is your clinical judgment, with the structured template-driven data (PHQ-9 score, SUDS curve, thought record) as supporting context that auto-filled where it fit. Control. The structured data is captured in the templates — scores, target IDs, SUDS readings, worksheet content. The note is your interpretation of that data. Rivet’s job is to put the structured data in your hands; your job is the formulation, the plan, the clinical voice. That’s the line we drew, and it’s the line you reinforce every time you author a note here.Where the note fits in the session flow
A practitioner-private note can be open at the same time as a client-fillable template. They live in parallel — the client sees the PHQ-9 overlay on their device, you see the SOAP note overlay on yours, and the two don’t bleed into each other. When you minimize the SOAP overlay to take a break, the in-progress text stays in browser memory. When you reopen it, the partial draft is still there. When the call ends, the in-progress text disappears unless you exported it first. The session-summary export — covered in Exporting notes — bundles your notes with every other completed template into a single PDF. Practitioner- authored notes lead the summary; screening + worksheet content follows as appendices. That ordering matches how clinical charts read: the practitioner’s note is the entry; the templates are evidence.Related articles
SOAP vs DAP
Picking the format that fits your style.
Why no AI transcription
The deliberate decision behind the no-recording posture.
Notes and your EHR
How the copy-into-Jane workflow lands.
