Activity check-in

The activity check-in is the unit of behavioral activation. Your client did something; they rate the sense of getting something done (mastery) and the enjoyment (pleasure); over a week or two of these, patterns emerge that point at where engagement is producing reward and where it isn’t. The pleasure-and-mastery pairing dates to Lewinsohn 1974. It’s still the core BA assessment fifty years later because the depression-maintenance cycle (withdrawal → no reward → less motivation → more withdrawal) is what the ratings catch.

​

What it captures

Five fields, single-activity entry:

• Date — the day the activity happened
• What you did — short string, the activity itself
• Sense of getting something done — 0-10 slider, none → a lot (mastery)
• How much you enjoyed it — 0-10 slider, none → a lot (pleasure)
• Notes (optional) — context, who was there, what came up

No total score. The clinical signal lives in the pattern of mastery and pleasure ratings across many entries over a week.

​

When to use it

The core BA intervention is built around these:

• Session 1-2 — introduce the worksheet alongside psychoeducation about the depression cycle. Walk through one activity from yesterday together so the client understands the mastery/pleasure distinction.
• Between sessions, early treatment — one activity per day. The goal is data, not change, in the first week. The client is looking at the activities they’re already doing, not adding new ones yet.
• Reviewed weekly — bring the entries into session, look for patterns. Activities with high mastery but low pleasure (productive but joyless). Activities with high pleasure but low mastery (rewarding but small). Days with nothing logged at all.
• Activity scheduling — once patterns are visible, you start scheduling activities that previous entries showed produced mastery or pleasure. The check-in becomes the feedback loop.
• Spot-checks later in treatment — once the BA work has produced behavioral momentum, scaled back to a few entries per week.

​

Mastery and pleasure are separate

The whole reason for two ratings rather than one is that the depression cycle hides mastery from awareness. A depressed client who finished a load of laundry will often say “that wasn’t anything” — discounting the mastery — which feeds the no-reward loop. Pulling the rating out as its own number makes the discounting harder. Pleasure works the other way for some clients — they can list activities they “should” enjoy but rate them low, surfacing anhedonia as the target.

​

In-session mechanics

Templates → Activity check-in, the renderer drops into the right pane. The fields are short — date, activity, two sliders, optional notes — so the in-session use is fast. You can fill several in a row during a weekly review by reading from the client’s notes app or paper log. The whole entry copies to clipboard from the response detail for paste into session notes.

​

Citation

Martell, C. R., Addis, M. E., & Jacobson, N. S. (2001). Depression in Context: Strategies for Guided Action. W. W. Norton. Earlier roots: Lewinsohn, P. M. (1974). “A behavioral approach to depression.” In R. J. Friedman & M. M. Katz (Eds.), The Psychology of Depression: Contemporary Theory and Research. The pleasure/mastery rating tradition dates from Lewinsohn 1974 and is now generic clinical method, uncopyrightable. Rivet’s field labels and plain-language phrasing are original.

​

When not to use it

• Anxiety-only presentations without behavioral withdrawal. The worksheet is built for the depression-cycle target. Anxious clients without avoidance patterns are usually better served by the exposure log or behavioral experiment.
• Clients who can’t tolerate self-monitoring. A few clients find daily self-rating activating and shame-inducing. If the worksheet is making the cycle worse, drop it and re-introduce after the therapeutic alliance has scaffolded the work.

​

Related articles