Skip to main content
The WAI-SR is how you find out whether the working relationship is strong before it goes sideways. Twelve client-rated items across three subscales — task agreement, goal agreement, and the therapeutic bond. Sustained low scores are a signal to slow down and repair; a sudden drop session-over-session is a signal to ask what changed.

​
What it measures

Bordin’s (1979) three-component model of the therapeutic alliance:
  • Task agreement — does the client agree with what you’re doing in session?
  • Goal agreement — does the client agree on what you’re working toward?
  • Bond — does the client experience the relationship as one of mutual respect and care?
Strong alliance is the single most reliable common-factor predictor of therapy outcome across modalities — roughly 30 meta-analyses put the alliance-outcome correlation around r = 0.25-0.30.

​
When to use it

  • After session 3-5 to establish an early-alliance baseline
  • Every 4-6 sessions to track the trend
  • Any time you sense a rupture
  • Before a termination decision — sustained low scores plus stalled outcome measures is a referral signal
The WAI-SR is client-rated by default — the client is the source of truth on whether the alliance is working.

​
How clients fill it out

About three minutes self-administered. The wording uses an underlined blank where the therapist’s name goes (“I believe __ likes me”) — the client mentally substitutes your name. Rivet’s renderer presents the blank verbatim per the canonical instrument.

​
How Rivet scores it

Sum of 12 items, each rated 1-5 (Seldom / Sometimes / Fairly often / Very often / Always). Range 12-60. Higher = stronger alliance.
TotalBand
12-35Weak alliance — explore rupture / repair work
36-47Moderate alliance
48-60Strong alliance

​
Three subscales (each 4-20)

SubscaleItems
Task agreement1, 2, 10, 12
Bond3, 5, 7, 9
Goal agreement4, 6, 8, 11
The per-subscale scores are exposed so you can see whether a low total is driven by misalignment on tasks, on goals, or by the bond — three very different conversations to have.

​
How to read it

The WAI-SR is a continuous tracking variable, not a diagnostic cutoff. Trend across sessions matters more than any single absolute score. A drop from session N to N+1 is the actionable signal — that’s when to ask “is something we’re doing not working for you?”

​
When NOT to use it

The WAI-SR asks the client to evaluate the relationship — which is itself a relationship event. Some clients with interpersonal trauma or strong people-pleasing patterns will inflate scores to keep you happy. Pair the measure with your own clinical read.

​
Citation

Hatcher, R. L., & Gillaspy, J. A. (2006). Development and validation of a revised short version of the Working Alliance Inventory. Psychotherapy Research, 16(1), 12-25. Based on Horvath, A. O., & Greenberg, L. S. (1989). Development and validation of the Working Alliance Inventory. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 36(2), 223-233. Free academic / clinical use per Hatcher.

Measure trajectories

Reading a WAI-SR trend the way you’d read a PHQ-9 trend — direction over time, not single-point absolutes.

Clinical change thresholds

What counts as a meaningful WAI-SR shift between sessions.

Administering measures in session

Patterns for routine post-session WAI-SR administration without it feeling clinical or interruptive.