What it measures
Seventeen items covering:- Depressed mood, guilt, suicide
- Insomnia (early, middle, late)
- Work and activities, retardation, agitation
- Anxiety (psychic and somatic)
- Somatic symptoms (general and gastrointestinal)
- Genital symptoms
- Hypochondriasis, weight loss, insight
When to use it
- Longitudinal monitoring of depression severity in psychiatric or consultation-liaison contexts
- Treatment-response outcome measurement (the standard for response is ≥50% reduction in total score; remission is total ≤7 sustained across three weeks per Frank et al. 1991)
- Pre/post measurement in ECT, TMS, ketamine, and trial protocols
- STAR*D-style stepped-care workflows
How you fill it
Solo fill. Open HAM-D from the templates picker and tap New response. The renderer walks you through each item with the Williams 1988 SIGH-D anchor language distilled into the answer options. You score from the structured interview probes — typically 15-30 minutes for a trained rater. The form never goes to the client. There is no “Send to client” option for this measure.Scoring and severity cutoffs
Total = sum of all 17 items, with the mixed-weight scoring above.Severity bands (Frank et al. 1991)
Clinical change thresholds
- Response: ≥50% reduction in total score from baseline
- Remission: total ≤7, sustained across three weeks
Item 3 — suicide
For documented safety planning, pair the HAM-D with the C-SSRS or a Stanley-Brown safety plan in the same session.Rater training
The HAM-D requires rater training for reliable scoring. The standard reference is the Williams 1988 Structured Interview Guide for the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (SIGH-D), which provides probe questions and severity anchors. It’s free at the University of Wisconsin psychiatry library. Inter-rater reliability on trained raters typically reaches ICC 0.85+ (Bagby 2004).What we render vs. the source
Verbatim Hamilton 1960 items, with Williams 1988 SIGH-D severity anchors distilled into the choice display text. The total computes as a simple sum; factor-analysis subscales are not surfaced. One known difference: item 16 (weight loss) is a single combined item in Rivet. The original Hamilton 1960 allowed either “A: by history” or “B: actual weight change measured” with item 16 = max of the two. Rivet collapses to a single rating. The 21-item Hamilton 1967 extension (diurnal variation, depersonalization, paranoid symptoms, obsessional symptoms) isn’t included — the 17-item version is the dominant clinical-practice configuration.HAM-D vs PHQ-9 and the BDI-II
The HAM-D is rated by you in an interview; the PHQ-9 is filled in by the client in two minutes. Both measure depression severity and they are not interchangeable numbers. Reach for the HAM-D when the measurement has to carry weight — tracking response to a medication change, a course of treatment where response is defined formally (a 50% drop) and remission has a threshold (7 or below), or any context where the standard from six decades of depression trials is the expected instrument. Reach for the PHQ-9 for routine tracking, for anything sent ahead of a session, and when a referrer needs a number they recognise. The real cost of the HAM-D is your time and your training. Reliable scoring depends on familiarity with the rating anchors; the structured interview guide exists for that, and it is free. Against the BDI-II: the Beck inventory is the self-report scale most often set beside the HAM-D. It’s licensed by Pearson and paid for per administration, so Rivet doesn’t include it — the library was built from instruments with no per-use fee. The PHQ-9 is the self-report depression measure to pair with the HAM-D here.Is it free to use?
Yes — it is public domain. Hamilton published it in 1960 and it has been the standard clinician-administered depression rating scale in clinical trials ever since. Williams’ SIGH-D structured interview guide is public domain too.Citations
- Hamilton, M. (1960). “A rating scale for depression.” Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry, 23(1): 56-62. Public domain.
- Williams, J. B. W. (1988). “A structured interview guide for the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale.” Archives of General Psychiatry, 45(8): 742-747.
- Frank, E., Prien, R. F., Jarrett, R. B., Keller, M. B., Kupfer, D. J., Lavori, P. W., Rush, A. J., & Weissman, M. M. (1991). “Conceptualization and rationale for consensus definitions of terms in major depressive disorder. Remission, recovery, relapse, and recurrence.” Archives of General Psychiatry, 48(9): 851-855.
Related articles
HAM-A
The Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale. Frequently paired with HAM-D in
mixed depression/anxiety presentations.
C-SSRS
Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale. The dedicated suicide
severity instrument; use it when item 3 fires.
