Skip to main content
The MAAS is the brief measure of dispositional mindfulness. Not a state read of “how mindful are you right now” — a trait read of how often, in day-to-day life, the client is actually present versus running on autopilot.

What it measures

Fifteen items, each describing a mindless experience — “I find myself doing things without paying attention”, “I could be experiencing some emotion and not be conscious of it until some time later”. That framing is intentional. Brown and Ryan (2003) found dispositional mindfulness is more reliably measured by asking about its absence than its presence — people can report “I missed that” more honestly than “I was fully present.”

When to use it

  • Pre/post a mindfulness-based intervention (MBSR, MBCT, the mindfulness modules in DBT or ACT)
  • Baseline for any course of treatment where present-moment attention is part of the work
  • Periodic re-administration to track whether the client’s lived experience of attention is shifting outside session

How clients fill it out

Three to five minutes self-administered. Items are rated on a 1-6 scale (Almost always → Almost never).

How Rivet scores it

The response scale is intentionally inverted. Because every item describes a mindless experience, the designers flipped the scale so that:
  • 1 = Almost always (most often mindless = least mindful)
  • 6 = Almost never (rarely mindless = most mindful)
Higher raw score = more mindful. No engine-level reverse-scoring — the scale is already in “higher = better” direction by design.

Total

Sum 15-90, or canonical mean (sum / 15) on the 1-6 scale. No diagnostic cutoff — the MAAS is descriptive. Brown and Ryan published US adult norms of approximately M = 4.0 (SD ≈ 0.7) on the 1-6 per-item average, which is a useful comparator but not a clinical threshold.
If the scoring direction looks “backwards” at first glance — it isn’t. Every item is mindless-framed, and the scale was deliberately built so that higher numbers mean more mindful behaviour. Don’t reverse-score it.

How to read it

The MAAS trends slowly. A meaningful shift after a four-week mindfulness-based intervention is in the 0.3-0.5 range on the per-item average. Smaller shifts session-to-session are within measurement noise.

MAAS vs SCS-SF

Both are descriptive process measures with no diagnostic cutoff, and both belong to mindfulness-adjacent work, but they measure different things. The MAAS measures attention — whether the person is present to what they are doing, or operating on autopilot. Every item describes a mindless moment, and the response scale is inverted by design so that a higher score still means more mindful. The SCS-SF measures how the person treats themselves when things go badly, across six dimensions — three kind and three harsh. Someone can be highly present and still brutal with themselves. If the work is attention training, the MAAS is closer to it; if the work is about the inner critic, the SCS-SF is. For emotion-regulation style rather than either, that’s the ERQ.

Is it free to use?

Yes. Free clinical and research use, per Brown and Ryan.

Citation

Brown, K. W., & Ryan, R. M. (2003). The benefits of being present: Mindfulness and its role in psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(4), 822-848. Free clinical / research use.

Self-compassion break

The Neff/Germer MSC exercise — pairs naturally with mindfulness tracking.

Mood diary

Day-to-day affect data to triangulate against MAAS trend.

Mindfulness whiteboard preset

Visual mindfulness exercises for in-session use alongside the MAAS.